Evidence & Foundations

Grounded in published science. Verified through discovery.

AutoPraxys bridges peer-reviewed human–AI interaction literature with empirical behavioral observation. We separate measurable interaction signals from unverified causal assertions.

Peer-Reviewed Literature

Independent Academic Research on Human–AI Interaction

Our product thesis is anchored in rigorous published findings on cognitive offloading, overreliance, and the jagged technological frontier. Note: External published studies document broader human–AI behavioral challenges; they do not claim to validate or endorse the Praxys platform specifically.

Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper No. 24-013 / SSRN.View primary publication

Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality

Dell'Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023).

“For tasks outside the frontier, AI decreased consultants' performance, with consultants using AI being 19 percentage points less likely to produce correct solutions compared to those without AI.”

Relevance to Praxys: Demonstrates the 'jagged frontier' effect: workers frequently overestimate AI capabilities on complex tasks, accepting flawed answers without critical verification.

Science, 381(6654), 187–192.View primary publication

Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence

Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023).

“Generative AI technology increased productivity: average time to complete tasks dropped by ~40%, and output quality rose by ~0.45 standard deviations... AI compressed productivity inequality, but raises critical questions regarding skill development and independent problem-solving.”

Relevance to Praxys: Confirms that while AI dramatically accelerates production speed, it simultaneously introduces dependencies on foundational cognitive stages.

Microsoft Research / ACM CHI 2022 Workshop on Trust and Reliance in AI-assisted Tasks.View primary publication

Overreliance on AI Systems: Path Toward Addressing Overreliance

Passi, S., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2022).

“Overreliance occurs when people uncritically accept AI recommendations, failing to identify errors even when they possess the requisite domain knowledge to do so.”

Relevance to Praxys: Directly describes the 'Capability Illusion' observed in AutoPraxys discovery interviews: users with sufficient training overlook errors due to cognitive offloading.

Qualitative Discovery

Initial Field Discovery Cohorts

Before engineering software, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews to understand how AI tools change working behavior.

150

STEM Students Interviewed

Qualitative discovery sessions across university cohorts assessing prompt iteration habits and independent problem articulation.

10

University Professors Consulted

Computer science and engineering faculty evaluating learning visibility, academic integrity, and pedagogical assessment challenges.

3

Industry Engineering Leads

Senior software engineering managers assessing junior developer code comprehension and code-review confidence.

Methodological Limitations: These interviews represent qualitative exploratory discovery aimed at identifying problem areas. They do not constitute controlled double-blind trials or causal claims of cognitive skill degradation. AutoPraxys is currently partnering with academic institutions to establish formal experimental validation.
Architectural Taxonomy

How Praxys Compares to Existing Tool Categories

Different software categories serve different purposes. Praxys does not replace AI assistants; it introduces the missing behavioral observation layer.

CategoryInteraction TelemetryPre-Dispatch AssuranceFriction AnalysisSocratic CoachingPrivacy Boundary
Consumer AI Interfaces (Web)Session length & text log onlyPost-hoc filter / provider discretionNone (individual chat interface)None (answers provided directly)Cloud-hosted; provider terms govern training
Developer Copilot ExtensionsAcceptance rate & active keypressPublic code match detectionBasic acceptance percentageNone (completion-oriented)Telemetry governed by enterprise license tier
Traditional LMS PlatformsSubmission timestamp & grade onlyPlagiarism text similarityNone (static submission portal)Summative test scoresInstitutionally hosted student records
Praxys Intelligence PlatformInteraction cadence & edit physicsPre-dispatch regex & entropy policy scansLoop detection & friction diagnosticsSocratic reflection & autonomy calibrationMetadata-first; client-side isolation by default

* Analysis based on documented public product documentation and API specifications as of Q4 2026. Enterprise tiers for frontier providers offer robust SOC2 and zero-data-retention guarantees for server-side processing; Praxys operates client-side at the interaction interface.

Research Working Paper

AutoPraxys Research Brief: Behavioral Observation Protocol

Our methodology working paper detailing client telemetry normalization, metric calculation indices, and early pilot observations is currently undergoing peer review with academic advisors.